Looking for:

Download stand up comedy season 4 dzawin

Click here to Download


In addition, besides entertaining, there is an aspiration that comes from the comic to against the phenomena that occur nowadays and it also can be new knowledge for audience who watch it. Thus, stand-up comedy could also be regarded as a form of comedy art performance.

Usually, a comedian stands up in front of the audience and speaks directly to them with certain message they intend to deliver. The message could be about social or any issues and all are wrapped in a humorous verbal language. Language in humor especially in stand-up comedy which rely on verbal communication plays a central role. Humorous utterance constitutes a significant portion of stand-up comedy performance and stands as major and universal functions of communication means along with its function to convey information funnily.

Despite the difficulties to construct theory explaining how language could trigger humor, linguistic approach called discourse analysis attempt to elaborate the matters. Discourse analysis is used widely in a variety of disciplines and there are many different approaches that comprise discourse analysis.

In Discourse analysis, language is not only analyzed by describing from the language aspect but also relating to the context. The context means that the language is used for certain purposes and practices. There are four principles of critical discourse analysis: social and political issues, power relations, social relations, and ideologies. Language used in humor especially stand-up comedy usually is a daily based vocabulary language.

Although language in humor seems looks all similar, linguistic evidence shows that humorous language differs from other types of language [4] [5]. However, there is no current research available to support the current theories. What is more, the studies conducted by [4] and [5] solely researched humorous language as found in written texts and not found in other types of humorous language, such as stand-up comedy. Neither seem particularly interested in the workings of the language of stand-up comedy.

Furthermore, there are no current studies available where the theories of [4]and [5] tested on the language of stand-up comedy to see whether this type of humorous language adheres to the same theories as written humorous language. Thus, this research trying to fill the gap by focuses on describing the critical discourse analysis, the perception of comic and audience, and the content analysis of stand-up comedian.

The standup comedian chosen as the subject in this study is Dzawin as he is one of the prominent stand-up comedian figures in Indonesia. Hence, it is necessary to conduct the research in terms of stand-up comedy humor.

Literature Review Humor such as stand-up comedy has long been gaining considerable attention form researchers. Linguists such as [4] and [5] for instance, have proposed various linguistic humor theories, which describe figurative language features of humorous language found in written texts such as novels and spoken forms such as plays.

He divides humor theories into three categories: essentialist, teleological, and substantialist. He further explains that it is widely recognized that humor research is an interdisciplinary field and that it started with the great philosophers Plato and Aristotle. Similar to Attardo, Nash finds the question as to what makes language particularly funny a difficult one. He even suggests that there is no clear answer to that question. In a specific form delivery of humor such as in stand-up comedy where the trigger of the laughing from the audience is mainly caused by verbal one way communication, the creation of humor in stand-up comedy is seen as a combination of various linguistic features of joke telling such as wordplay and punning, hyperbole, repetitions, timing, and paralinguistic choices.

In addition, the comedians develop a specific stage persona and create their own style of performing. Spontaneity and flexibility are shown to be two of the most important characteristics that a stand-up comedian must possess in order to give a successful performance. Reference [6] additionally explains four humor styles that correspond to the inclusive and exclusive humor that the might come from standup comedy context. These humor styles represent the ways that individuals use in order to cope with others, relationships and stress in everyday life.

They define self- enhancing humor as encompassing personal aspects of humor and referring to a humor style that individuals use to cope with stress, change their perspective about problems or minimizing negative emotions. The first form of negative humor is aggressive humor, a style of humor in which individuals use humor in a socially inappropriate, detrimental way in the expense other in order to satisfy their own needs about their superiority and pleasure.

The last type of humor they describe is self-defeating humor or ridicule humor. As stand-up comedy is not merely about delivering humor but have a message to deliver as well, analyzing the language used in this type of humor performance requires a discourse.

Reference [7] reports that studies of discourse analysis which could be employed to investigate any utterances can be classified along two different theoretical dimensions.

The first dimension deals with the significance of text versus context. The second dimension is concerned with the extent of studies that focus on power relations versus studies that focus more on processes that constitute social reality. Reference [7] identify four major perspectives that are used in empirical studies from these two axes: social linguistic analysis, interpretive structuralism, critical discourse analysis and critical linguistic analysis. Critical discourse analysis can be used to analyze how discourses shape stereotypes and social structures.

Reference [8] posits that discourse analysis and its relation to power should be an analysis of power effects.

Similarly, Reference [9] asserted that critical discourse analysis is a type of discourse analytic research that primarily studies ways in which abuse, dominance, and social power inequalities are enforced, reproduced, and opposed by texts and speech in social and political context. Additionally, the purpose of critical discourse analysis is to express some of the hidden and invisible values, positions, and perspectives and critical discourse analysis also starts with the assumption that language use is always social and that discourse both reflects and constructs the social word [10].

Discourse analysis uses language in the text to be analyzed, but the language analyzed is different from the study of language in terms of traditional linguistics.

Some studies have been conducted regarding to this humor and discourse analysis issues. Politicians are more concerned with the problems of elite politics and party members than the issue of public interest.

Abdur also criticized the government about discrimination of eastern people and disappointment with the government in eastern people who lacked the government’s attention. In addition, in the humor discourse delivered by Abdur as [11] argues also criticized education, infrastructure, social needs, information technology, social inequality issues, Indonesians who do not care about their art and culture, low performance in sports, and lack of government assistance to social health in remote villages.

The context as a comic that cannot hinder from Abdur’s life background makes people express social problems. Abdur’s perception and audience is that Abdur’s humorous discourse has something that can arouse audience interest, not only for entertainment but also for messages that make them pay more attention to the environment around them.

The method used in this research was qualitative descriptive. The data were collected from video of Dzawin on YouTube. After transcribing and selecting the data, it was necessary to examine them thoroughly in order to identify categories for the analysis.

The study applied content analysis in order to devise a cohesive description of the phenomenon in question. The equivalent used is referential equivalent, namely the determinant of the reality designated by language. The data analysis techniques used in this research is a form change technique teknik ubah wujud.

The data were in the form of oral discourse, and then were changed into written discourse. The data were then later paraphrased in order to clarify the discourse.

Findings A. I write down all my materials from Indonesia into the English and memorize it even the word I write down all my materials and memorize it and memorize it. Something funny in Indonesia may not be funny in Malaysia because of the different contexts between the two. He seems to indicate that Indonesian people when going to the mosque they will lose their slippers or shoes. It means that the Indonesians are still lack of good manner. It seems not only to entertain but also to persuade us to be better people.

Through stand-up comedy, all his materials consisted of moral value. For instance, as an Indonesian, he or she realizes that stealing is a bad attitude. Having said that, in Islam religion, stealing is forbidden and people who do it will get punishment sin. Based on his utterance above, it can be seen that some of Indonesian have bad attitude, for instance taking other people slipper or shoes.

As we know, stealing is bad attitude and people who do it will get sin in Islam. Discussion Dzawin stand-up comedy seems to combine both positive and negative styles of humor where he humbly attacked himself and as well criticize the society surrounding him. Ridicule is features of the joke telling techniques that display impoliteness and aggressiveness. Ted Alexandro 2. The Amazing Johnathan. The Sklar Brothers. Todd Barry. Todd Barry 2. Todd Glass. Todd Lynn.

Tom Cotter. Tom Papa. Tom Papa 2. Tom Papa 2 Season 4, Episode 14 TV CC SD Tom Papa explains how suspicion is the foundation of true love, the best way to tell if someone is your soulmate, and what he’s really hiding in the medicine cabinet in this stand-up special.

Tom Rhodes. Tom Rhodes 2. Tom Shillue. Tommy Johnagin. Tony Woods. Tracy Smith. Ty Barnett. Vic Henley. Vince Morris. Wanda Sykes. Wayne Federman. Zach Galifianakis. Additional information Networks Comedy Central. Pergi ke paling atas. Daftar isi move to sidebar sembunyikan. Halaman Pembicaraan. Bahasa Indonesia. Baca Sunting Sunting sumber Lihat riwayat.

Lainnya Baca Sunting Sunting sumber Lihat riwayat. Beler Bintang Ate Chris. Kategori tersembunyi: Artikel dengan pranala luar nonaktif Artikel dengan pranala luar nonaktif permanen Articles with hCards Semua orang hidup Semua artikel biografi Artikel biografi November Nama pengguna Twitter sama seperti Wikidata AC dengan 0 elemen Artikel artis Indonesia yang perlu diberi gambar.

Pelawak tunggal Komedian.



(PDF) A Critical Discourse Analysis of Dzawin’s Stand Up Comedy Humor | Dede Setiono – replace.me.Comedy Central Presents: Stand-up

WebDzawin Nur Ikram atau dikenal dengan Dzawin berhasil menembus 3 besar di SUCI 4. Ia merupakan seseorang asli kelahiran Bogor yang kini lebih senang berpetualang dan ia . WebThis research aims to describe the critical discourse analysis, the perception of comic and audience, and the content analysis of Dzawin’s standup comedy humor discourse. . WebDzawin is the third winner of Indonesia Stand Up Comedy contest season 4 (SUCI 4) held by Kompas TV in and also the third winner of Maharaja Lawak Mega, one of the .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *